Losing your job under questionable circumstances creates immediate stress, financial change. and professional instability. Seeking objective job dismissal advice and analysis of the workplace can protect your employment law rights during this transition. It can open the door to remedies, including identifying violations of law, and accessing retroactive forms of justice. If you are in the aftermath, and have documents related to how it ended, gather them.
At Mosson Law, LLC, the first meeting between an attorney and prospective client is a legal consultation. These are being handled remotely for the most part and you can conduct a legal consultation by phone from your home. They are conducted at a charge.
In Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri, the U.S. Supreme Court clarifies that employment discrimination claims can proceed at court where "harm" is alleged to have occurred based on a protected status, with "harm" being tangible, but not always significant or economic. Slip Op No. 22-193 (2024).
In Johnson v. Baltimore City et. al., the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals revived a dismissed lawsuit and affirmed a lenient pleading standard in Maryland federal courts for pleading a racial discrimination case based upon the theory of disparate treatment. Slip Op. 25-1124 (4th Cir. Jan. 6, 2026). The Fourth Circuit examined comparisons taken "together," and found them sufficient to state a disparate treatment claim, sufficient to proceed initially.
The U.S. Supreme Court has affirmed a single standard for racial discrimination employment claims, under Title VII of The 1964 Civil Rights Act, inAmes v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, Slip Op. 23-1039, 605 U.S. ___ (June 5, 2025). This includes racial discrimination alleged by the "majority culture," or sometimes framed as "reverse race discrimination claims," because employers are alleged to fire caucasians due to their causasian and/or white race.
Are you navigating the complexities of unemployment benefits in Maryland? Understanding the filing process can be crucial to securing the financial support you need in a timely manner. In this overview, we at Mosson Law, LLC, break down the essential basics of Maryland's unemployment benefits. For personalized assistance, contact us.
Facing workplace discrimination can be daunting, but you don't have to tackle it alone. From documenting incidents to understanding your rights under laws like Title VII and the ADA, or how to file at the EEOC, and onward, Mosson Law, LLC, brings over a decade of experience in prosecuting these claims. This article provides an overview of workplace discrimination in Maryland.
In the complex world of employment law, disputes between employers and employees can arise. Navigating these disputes requires a thorough understanding of legal rights and obligations, making the role of legal representation indispensable. At Mosson Law LLC, we shine a light on justice, offering expert guidance to individuals, employees, executives, consultants, and independent contractors, Maryland-wide.
In the realm of employment law, misconceptions abound, often leaving employees in Baltimore unsure of their rights and obligations. This blog post aims to dispel seven common myths surrounding employment law, providing clarity for employees in Maryland. This article deals with seven common myths about employment. Stay informed and empowered with accurate knowledge to protect your U.S. and Maryland employee rights.
The Fourth Circuit in Barbour v. Garland has clarified the initial pleading standard in a manner helpful to job applicants and dedicated professionals in reinstating a retaliation lawsuit against the DEA. Slip Op No. 22-1815 (4th Cir., June 24, 2024).
In Bills v. WVNH EMP, LLC, et. al., a certified nurse assistant caring for a disabled male patient, who made advances on her, was not protected by federal sexual harassment law when slapping his hand away on three different admitted occasions. She was fired for slapping the patient and this was held lawful.
Maryland has banned non-compete agreements for licensed health care professionals caring for patients who make $350,000 annually or less, starting on July 1, 2025. Licensed veterinarian professionals are covered too.
In the recent case of Shigley v. Tydings & Rosenberg, LLP, the Maryland federal court provided guidance on asserting a religious accommodation claim in the workplace.
In a recent federal court decision, the U.S. District Court for Maryland approved a retaliation claim to move forward into discovery, and illustrates what is required in Abdus-Shahid v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore.